Conclusions
& Recommendations
Domestic
violence is, not surprisingly, widespread in Coventry. We were uniformly advised
by respondents, both local and national, that there should not be any difficulty
in attracting sufficient referrals to a programme for non-convicted perpetrators.
Achieving an ethnic and social mix would require work on appropriate publicity
and outreach but would be possible on a city-wide basis. The most highly respected
services operate a men's programme and a women's support service integrated
within one specialist, formally constituted voluntary organisation, with the
workers for both located in the same office base. One at least has come to this
arrangement in preference to a previous partial separation and considers it
the best way of meeting the safety needs of women and children. Local women's
organisations, on the other hand, felt that they should take on any support
work with women. This issue would need resolving, perhaps through a hybrid model
as appears to operate in Colchester. Whatever is decided, there would need to
be the closest possible working relationship between any new project and existing
local organisations, particularly those working with abused women.
The project, if established, should
adopt the minimum standards and good practice guidelines developed by the National
Practitioners' Network (now relaunched as Respect) as a baseline for any new
development, since they represent agreed best practice (Respect, 2000; see Appendix
1). Beyond this, the practitioners appointed to the potential project should
be free to learn about, and to adapt, the detailed content in use in the most
firmly established projects elsewhere, taking into account whether or not these
have been evaluated in recommended ways.
The biggest problem for such a development might lie in raising adequate resources.
A service level agreement with social services, if they were willing, could
fill from a third to a half of the available places and, at the same time, provide
some security in funding. The other priority beyond what has already been done
should be in approaching a greater range of bodies in the health sector (currently
in a state of flux) because of the link with both women's and men's mental health,
and with the physical well-being of women and children. There is a strong argument
that domestic violence work falls within NHS priorities for a healthier nation.
A wide range of organisations could be asked to contribute in cash or kind.
Assistance from the City Council with low-cost premises would be invaluable,
as would a formalised secondment of sessional workers from other agencies to
co-lead groups. There would be one-off costs involved in equipping premises
and undertaking initial publicity for which a range of organisations and community
groups could fund-raise or make contributions. There would still be a need to
attract substantial grant funding.
Without some consistency and security of resourcing for its core work, it would
be more difficult for the project to recruit experienced workers and to put
down roots in its local environment. This would, in any case, be a tall order
but experience elsewhere suggests that it can be done. Although the project
would be small, it would immediately become part of an impressive and supportive
local partnership and national network. The latter would welcome another voluntary
sector initiative since there is some feeling that the Home Office is imposing
uniformity. Chances of successfully establishing a new organisation would therefore
be good. Many of the key agencies in Coventry are already on board. There is
more work to be done across the local community where the potential for widespread
support is high but where considerable awareness-raising and information-sharing
would still be needed. Minority ethnic communities would need to be closely
involved, with participation by Asian and African Caribbean perpetrators in
the project posing particular challenges for appropriate policy and practice
development. The project's accountability to women would need to be reflected
in a high level of involvement by local women's organisations in the design
and delivery of the programme.
All sectors currently share a frustration with the lack of appropriate responses
available in the Coventry area, outside of the criminal justice system, to challenge
men's violent and abusive behaviour. There would inevitably be suspicions as
to what a new body working with violent men could achieve and how it would operate.
Working to agreed national principles would help to answer most of these concerns
but all those involved would need to recognise that only a limited proportion
of men do change their behaviour, however intensive the efforts of dedicated
and skilled professionals, and that the commitment of resources in this direction
can only ever form one aspect of a comprehensive raft of services. There has
to be a clear decision that it is one priority amongst many, where the alternatives
are to do nothing about violent men or to allow interventions to spring up,
detached from the specialist domestic violence umbrella groups, which may do
more harm than good.
If the project moves to the next
step, tasks will include:
maximising support for existing women's services and deciding how to design
an integrated women's service to work with partners;
outreach, publicity and awareness-raising across the City;
detailed consideration of how to make the programme appropriate for diverse
ethnic participation;
drawing up formalised policies, resourcing agreements and practice protocols
including to clarify boundaries with the criminal justice system and to optimise
interagency working more generally;
detailed budgeting and fund-raising;
locating suitable premises;
recruiting appropriately skilled and experienced workers;
providing them with adequate initial training, consultancy and supervision;
supporting them in operationalising the programme;
incorporating measures to maximise completion rates;
building in valid and reliable evaluation.
There remains a separate issue of
developing appropriate services for children which cannot be subsumed under
this current project but which the authors of this report would be pleased to
discuss further.